The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: you don't care?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: i. don't. care. first of all, (see in situ)

you don't care?

You don't care that he he pictures of women's jewelry along with a screwdriver, in the context of this case? You and everyone else knows the only reason that photo was not admitted at trial was that anyone with a logical brain would conclude taht the kid had it coming.

If he had been killed while carjacking and there was a picture of him cruising town in a new benz that he didn't own, while smoking a blunt with his buddies, that picture wouldn't be admitted either as it is not probative of the exact crime but it sure would be prejudicial if a trier of fact saw it.

It was kept out because ANYONE would care if they saw that. If you don't then your opinion is just that more suspect.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein