Comment: Well here is a jurist that

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I upvoted your post (see in situ)

Well here is a jurist that

Well here is a jurist that sat through this whole trial, voted to acquit him but believed he was guilty and many others on that jury apparently felt the same way.

Why if you believed him to be guilty would you vote to acquit him? What exactly was he guilty of? 1st degree murder, 2nd degree murder, or manslaughter?

Funny that you think people are attacking you when they just are questioning your logic.