Well free market if you don't count government funding and funding from government protected enterprise. But I do. You can't take money from Google or GE and think we're talking about a free market.
Anyway I'm not saying it's not a resource that should be availed upon. I'm saying it's anything but objective. They regularly scrub and slant when the issue is political or the truth is counter to the statist, progressive, or socialist narrative.
Anyway we don't need wikipedia to know Ron Paul is an austro-paleoconservative with libertarian/anarchist leanings.
If wiki says otherwise they are wrong. If they say otherwise it's because they have a bias and an agenda.