Comment: Twisting words again and false statements

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: There seems to be (see in situ)

Twisting words again and false statements

You make a lot of assumptions.

NOTE, the jury didn't find Zimmerman innocent but rather not guilty. Martin was the aggressor and unfortunately paid for it. If he were not the "attacker" then there would be no confrontation.

"The only reason Zimmerman got off was because there was no one that could refute his story." True, and there is evidence which supported his story. You stated it correctly. Follow the logic and not your biases.

You want to make Zimmerman guilty without evidence? Because your feelings are not happy for some reason? The rest of us look at facts and the evidence and say you can't make assumptions and make someone guilty. The reasonable doubt comes in. It's not a perfect system and yet it is the best system for us.

The jury decided correctly.

The night is far spent, the day is at hand.
And those who have not heard shall understand.