Comment: He doesn't clarify anything

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: What does he clarify? (see in situ)

He doesn't clarify anything

He doesn't clarify anything. He simply claims that the fires were worse than some people claim, and that there were plane parts around the pentagon and WTC (he doesn't explain they are for the incorrect aircraft). He does concede that the WTC7 shouldn't have collapsed symmetrically.

He clearly hasn't done the necessary research. Net: it's not worth the time to watch.