Comment: maybe you are concerned with

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: that's fine (see in situ)

maybe you are concerned with

maybe you are concerned with some statute somewhere, but all common sense and basic decency shows zimmerman to be an aggressor.

So the police are correct to arrest people for filming them because it is aggression. Got ya Regardless of the "law" following someone doesn't hurt you or steal from you. It does nothing to you at all.

what is martin supposed to walk in his front door so this possible murderer or rapist or whatever can know where he is living..?

He can do whatever he wants as long as he doesn't initiate violence. It's called the non aggression principle. You don't harm people who aren't harming you.

i'm concerned that this will be used to hurt the second amendment because most gun supporters aren't calling zimmerman out on his reckless and threatening behavior.

I'm calling bullshit on this, you're deflecting. If Zimmerman had been convicted it would have been a huge blow for stand your ground, conceal carry, and self defense laws. No one denies that.

Tell me what Zimmerman having a gun has to do with anything?

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."

Click Here To See The Candidates On The Record