Comment: Busy this evening but the smackdown will come

(See in situ)


Busy this evening but the smackdown will come

But just the obvious.. We have already established Mises was a statist so what is your point here? Why, when lobbying for statism, are you quoting a statist?

Friedman was also good on economics (except for monetary economics, they always give you Nobels for your weakest suit) but we don't point to him as being good on anything else.

Your whole thrust is based on a flawed understanding of rhetorical fallacy. You aren't even doing ad hominem right. Is Mises right? Or is he wrong? What is it you want people to think?

You don't even know.