Comment: Notes on National Debt Fraud

(See in situ)


Notes on National Debt Fraud

Example of why the words Public and Private are willfully confused?

1.
Public POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account.

2.
Private POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account.

How?

In the first case the claim is made that National Interest requires an expense, such as those expenses required when people in the country are being attacked by a foreign POWER. The example here is the attack by The British after The Declaration of Independence in 1776.

The people in the country, then called America, would either stand together and defend against attack or not, and there were expenses associated with defense against attack by The British.

We need to gain the power to defend ourselves, and so we do what is necessary to defend ourselves, and we do so voluntarily, and it is better to expend our power in defense now, while we have that power, rather than have all our power taken, including our power to defend.

So, having that in mind, the concept of We The People, being driven by duty to defend ourselves, as declared in The Declaration of Independence, are in need of cash. Enter zeros into the account, buy now, pay later.

So the Central Bankers claim that they are willing to stand in that role, as accountants, to keep the books on those expenses. OK. Who offers which supplies and services consumed in the defensive war effort? How much are they paid after the war is over, when productive, profitable, actions can resume and refill the stores of value that make up an actual power fund, or bank account, such as a silo full of grain, or a generator full of fuel, or a water tank full of water?

The public good is seen in this manner, as public service, as a pooling of resources so as to defend against attack as one, for if we do not stand together, we fall individually.

Here:
1.
Public POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account.

At the end of the Revolutionary War there was Debt owed by each voluntary member of the voluntary Union of defenders, and the accountants hired to keep the books were charged with the responsibility of knowing who gave up anything of value, and who failed to give up anything of value, and here is where the concept of being a solider in time of defensive war is willfully confused.

Does the country, or the people in the country, owe a greater debt to the suppliers of boots used by the soldiers, where that pay rate to the supplier of boots is a no-bid contract, an absurdly inflated price, whereby the supplier of boots does not give up anything, where instead the supplier of boots actually profits handsomely by that contract, or do the people in the country, or does the country, owe more to someone who lost their arm, leg, eye, or a family that lost a husband, owing a greater debt to those who give all, instead of owing a greater debt to those who profit from war, who get initially paid with paper, and who are then demanding gold as payment, "on par", for their "service" during defensive war?

The Central Bankers claim that they need to add zeros to the Public account for National Interest.

There are two sides to this false coin.

1.
Public POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account.

2.
Private POWER is said to be employed when adding zeros to the Central Bank account.

The same people at the same Central Bank add those zeros to the Public account, in defense against attack, in "our National Interest" and then with those zeros in that account those people loan those zeros out at Interest, effectively making a profit from the bounty of collective delusion.

Does the "interest" go back to National Interest, or is there suddenly a change of heart whereby the Central Bank is suddenly no longer Public? Now, in point of fact, according to the people at the Central Bank, the Bank is now Private, and therefore the Bank is now required to show a profit, and therefore the Interest payments are filling the banking accounts of the private individuals who own the private bank.

The bail-outs are no longer zeros added to the account in desperate times to defend against an army of aggressive military force invading and occupying homes, churches, towns, cities, counties, and States in this country, rather, the appropriate HAT is switched by the Central Bankers, there is suddenly a need to be a private entity in need of balancing their own, individual, separate, set of books.

1.
Public Fund, not ours, not in our own, private, interest. We are suddenly in need of our version of socialism.

2.
Private fund, ours, not yours, exclusive, not public, for our own interest, for no one but our own interest, not your interest, not the public interest. We are suddenly in need of our version of capitalism.

Who do you work for, a public servant might ask, do you work for your own interest, or do you work for National Interest?

Some people say, with much in the way of authority, that we all now work for the Central Bank. We are all employed in the work required to fill up The FUND.

Follow the money to make sure that the person asked is answering factually.

Which money?

The fraudulent money?

Joe