Comment: hold on

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: If all the DRO owners... (see in situ)

hold on

So you think we should design a non-aggressive monopoly in dispute resolution, that prohibits any competition to it. And the reason is because you feel that a free market in dispute resolution might become a state. But what you want to design is a state, and it's also aggressive, because it needs to prohibit competition.

So you want a state in order to reduce the chances that a free market will create a state.