So you think we should design a non-aggressive monopoly in dispute resolution, that prohibits any competition to it. And the reason is because you feel that a free market in dispute resolution might become a state. But what you want to design is a state, and it's also aggressive, because it needs to prohibit competition.
So you want a state in order to reduce the chances that a free market will create a state.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: