I am suddenly very upset about not speaking out on O J Simpson framed for armed theft, and the person with the gun not even charged. Loosing ones clothes was not before part of a civil suit. And evidence wasn't stated that O J Simpson even knew a gun would be used during the robbery. We keep getting fed the end result (putting someone in jail) who deserves to be is what count).
I think thoughtful bloggers don’t automatically use the “+” and “–“key, unless a “+” to represent overwhelming praise. Sadly the future may depend on us joining this petty nonsense. I don't have time to go through every comment especially since I won't minus a comment I differ with but helps me think.
If one is thoughtful but thinks this the verdict should stand, question where was the mud that certain Zimmerman idealizes claim. Point out if was wrong for him not to mention town-watch when Trayvon twice asked why were you following me? And that Trayvon feared what looked like a hoodlum finding out where he lived.
As far as the Constitution in the wild-west a sheriff could post “Guns must be left outside of town”. If Philadelphia until this century had passed a law no guns allowed in the cities many public squares no one would stop them. The logic that one must compromise rights in pursuit of security is what is driving us toward dictatorship, the President the most persuasive spokesperson for this argument.
Perhaps those who want gun control or who want the 99% not to get together is spreading overly shrill arguments
In Philly PA RichardKanePA
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the origin