Thank you. This is exactly what I am talking about. Another interview from AE911’s feature presentation from someone who says “trust me its true” without providing any documentation or analysis. The claims are sensational and certainly worth looking into. The gentleman seems credible and sincere. But this is not proof.
This makes my point perfectly. There is one published article on this in a pay for access journal. I am tired of “trust me.”
He states specifically:
“Anybody out there who has these types of capabilities, there is no reason why I should be looking at these things alone. The more people who can confirm, as I have done, the work of others, the more confidence we all have in the legitimacy of those results and I’d really like to stress that we need a lot more people involved in this work than just the few of us that are involved with it now.
He states “this really demands a new investigation” and “anyone can replicate this.”
This is my point. If it is so easy and obvious people need to take him up on his statements. Call it calling his bluff or whatever you want but this needs to be settled.
Its 2013. There is no investigation on the way that I can see. All this dust held by these individuals is doing no good. If this is true there should be massive exposure. People need to be working all the major research universities. It wouldn’t be that hard to do. Meet with the researchers and prove it. Start generating local coverage.
If it is true they need to run with it. From my experience there are no efforts being made to get researchers at Stanford or MIT to examine this. No efforts to contract with large reputable labs to actually document these facts, outside of people directly involved with this organization, and provide affidavits for use in legal proceedings.
However there are efforts being made to shy away from these activities, produce compelling documentaries and billboards and seemingly make sure this whole charade continues another decade.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: