Comment: I hear you.. My point was..

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I do have a problem (see in situ)

I hear you.. My point was..

I hear you..

My point was.. Martin was profiled. He wasn't committing a crime.. and so.. his "right" to be a kid walking home with candy/drink was taken away..

Sure.. we could argue at what point the non-aggression principle was broken.. but that wasn't the point of my article.. only that the kid wasn't doing anything that warranted being pursued..