Comment: I really cannot see any way

(See in situ)


I really cannot see any way

I really cannot see any way in which this trial has been an exercise in justice.
The government had been arguing from the beginning, without definition and solely on valuation evidence, that 'databases' mean 'databases', not 'records' and/or 'information', but the day before the closing arguments they are allowed to include records and information as part of the definition under databases?

In what world is this justice?