Comment: Gage may be resistant

(See in situ)


Gage may be resistant

Gage may be resistant because, even if nanothermite chips were
found there, it lacks the explosive capacity to have blown the Twin
Towers apart, as T. Mark Hightower and Jim Fetzer have explained:
“Has nanothermite been oversold to the 9/11 Truth community?”

http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2011/05/has-nanothermite-bee...

"Is '9/11 Truth' based upon a false theory?"

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/07/17/is-911-truth-based-u...

“Nanothermite: If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit!”

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/27/nanothermite-if-it-d...

Moreover, mini or micro nukes provide a better explanation. See

“9/11 Truth will out: The Vancouver Hearings II”

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/09/12/911-truth-will-out-t...

“Mini Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle” with Don Fox, Clare Kuehn, Jeff Prager, Jim Viken, Dr. Ed Ward and Dennis Cimino

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/10/29/mini-neutron-bombs-a...

“Mystery Solved: The WTC was Nuked on 9/11”

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/01/mystery-solved-the-w...

Gage knows about this research, so the question becomes, why
is he concealing it from the public? Why won't he even encourage
more research on the dust samples upon which he rests his case?

A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Thomas Jefferson. A vote for Rand Paul is a vote for James Madison.