Comment: Your almost there, at about 90% understanding

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: taz41 believes (see in situ)

Your almost there, at about 90% understanding

" if she had not gone on a tirade this post wouldn't exist. to try and make it about something else is a diversion. she did not go on a tirade because of property rights, but because he dared to ask if he was being detained, and because he refused to tell her where he was driving to next." You got that right.

However with regards to having to comply when asked "where are you going." It's none of there business and I to would refuse to answer that question. In an effort to be cordial I would have most likely responded with "up yonder".

"A vote for the lesser of two evils is a vote to keep things the same", Buckminster Fuller..
A choice for liberty is always a choice for liberty.