Comment: Why call it a problem when feature is such a prettier word?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Speaking of inserting data (see in situ)

Why call it a problem when feature is such a prettier word?

I take it from the '*'s that inserting such data is difficult to do - even for a techie-type? Does the community have to vote on such changes?

Also regarding songs or other data inserted in the code, an idea would be that the code would be cut up into little pieces as each bitcoin 2.0 is subdivided into, say, 100 million pieces as is the original bitcoin. In theory each of these micro units might contain as few as one bit of the 'file'.

So that even if the song which the bit belongs to is of the type of music you hate listening to you could still argue that the bit has market value or intrinsic/perceived value to someone else.

9-11 was a panda job.