Comment: No harm to others, or no harm

(See in situ)


No harm to others, or no harm

No harm to others, or no harm at all?

If no harm at all, then lots of people will claim psychoactive substances do harm and should be controlled by law.

If no harm to others, than your principle should extend to all substances including poisons, and suicide.

If you want to have a pure, principled litmus test, you have to extend the principle well beyond the 'in' drug of the day. Otherwise you are being just as unprincipled as the politician.

And if you tell me that weed is a plant and not a drug, I will roundhouse kick you to the face.