Comment: Wrong

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Multiple fallacies there (see in situ)

Wrong

You need to spend some time in MA if you believe there is no such thing as pro-homosexual propaganda in schools. Ever hear of the story King and King, read to K-1 in public school, that features two men that romantically kiss at the end? Do you know that parents can't opt their kids out? Have you heard of the David Parker case, or the Wirthlins? Don't tell me parents can combat pro-homosexual materials being presented to their kids in schools like it's easy. Have you heard of Fistgate? Have you heard of the Day of Silence in schools? Wake up, homosexuality and now transgender behavior is being pushed in our schools.

So, all mental health issues are able to be resolved by parents, with no professional intervention? Who are you to say who is a witch doctor? Is a witch doctor someone who believes that same sex attraction can be unwanted and that parents should be able to help a minor get help? I think it is very possible a teen can research how unhealthy homosexual acts are, and to not want to engage in them. Just like, a teen can look up for him or herself benefits of natural treatments for cancer. What if Christie was signing a law saying parents can't help their teen obtain natural treatments for cancer? Oh, and nowhere did I say that the parents weren't researching as well. They would be horrible parents if they did research on the harms of homosexual activity and did not share that with their teen.

How many times have natural medicine doctors been called quacks and witch doctors by big pharma / mainstream doctors? BTW, did you check out the MassResistance link about the hearing at the MA statehouse on this issue? The correct term is vitally important in shaping debate about an issue, is it not?

You might want to look up the work of Dr. Judith Reisman. She has done research which essentially says you can physically program your body to have a response to certain stimuli. Think of what that means in terms of someone being abused. Let's say a straight kid was abused from the age of 12 to the age of 14. Let's say it included use of homosexual porn. Even though the kid is no longer being abused, he still gets a physical reaction when he sees homosexual porn images. This reaction was not "inborn" it was programmed, but the kid doesn't realize this and gets confused.

Look up the health consequences associated with homosexual behavior. Don't keep your head in the sand. We don't want our kids doing this stuff to themselves and others. We certainly don't want politicians telling us we have to keep our children trapped in it.

Michael, the Archangel, defend us in battle. Mary, Our Mother, protect us under your mantle.