Comment: What *is* the message?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: It's not the site (see in situ)

What *is* the message?

*You* seem to be inferring that Snowden/Greenwald are actually big-government agents, and that their whistle blowing/reporting is actually *not* genuine whistle blowing/reporting, but that they are actually serving Obama/UN/big-government interests to further erode our privacy.

Meanwhile, the message of the piece on the site you link to seems to be that:
1) Greenwald is a racist (despite there being no evidence of such),
2) Greenwald is a radical libertarian (despite there being much evidence to the contrary),
3) the NSA is good,
4) because Greenwald criticizes the NSA, he's bad.

I don't see the correlation between your message and that of the piece on the site.