Obviously you still don't know what antinomianism is, and much like any word unfamiliar to someone, it's only intimidating to those who are too lazy or too proud to look it up. Big words do not entail an argument from authority, but rather demonstrate precision in conveying nuanced concepts of complex ideas. It must be that you don't know what an argument from authority is. And frankly I'm not convinced that you know what an argument is. Ironic that you would profess to be all knowing with regard to apologetic arguments, and yet admit that you have no desire to understand them. It stands to reason that if you don't understand the nuances that arguments are composed of, then you don't know the arguments.
Matthew Henry: "There is no proof of ignorance more common than conceit of knowledge. Much may be known, when nothing is known to good purpose. And those who think they know any thing, and grow vain thereon, are the least likely to make good use of their knowledge. Satan hurts some as much by tempting them to be proud of mental powers, as others, by alluring to sensuality."
1st Corinthians 8:2 "And if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know."
Galatians 6:3 "For if a man think himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself."
Proverbs 26:12 "Seest thou a man wise in his own conceit? there is more hope of a fool than of him."
Proverbs 26:16 "The sluggard is wiser in his own conceit than seven men that can render a reason."
Proverbs 12:15 "The way of a fool is right in his own eyes: but he that hearkeneth unto counsel is wise."
Proverbs 1:5 "A wise man will hear, and will increase learning; and a man of understanding shall attain unto wise counsels:"
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: