Comment: amuk....

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: We are? : ) (see in situ)


The phrase is often used in a less serious manner when describing something that is wildly out of control or causing a frenzy (e.g., a dog tearing up the living room furniture might be termed as "running amok.")

Kooks.......detached from reality.

Conspiracy....Economist Murray Rothbard distinguished between what he described as "shallow" and "deep" conspiracy theories. A theorist of the former variety observes a questionable or potentially shady event and asks Cui bono? ("who benefits?"), jumping to the conclusion that a posited beneficiary is in fact responsible for covertly influencing events. In contrast, the deep conspiracy theorist begins with a suspicious hunch, but goes further by seeking out reputable and verifiable evidence. Rothbard described the scholarship of deep conspiracy theorist as "essentially confirming your early paranoia through a deeper factual analysis".

As a conspiracy theory, those that believe that a New World Order or NWO refers to the emergence of a totalitarian one-world government.

Conspiracism serves the needs of diverse political and social groups in America and elsewhere. It identifies elites, blames them for economic and social catastrophes, and assumes that things will be better once popular action can remove them from positions of power.

"But if conspiracies exist, they rarely move history; they make a difference at the margins from time to time, but with the unforeseen consequences of a logic outside the control of their authors: and this is what is wrong with 'conspiracy theory.' History is moved by the broad forces and large structures of human collectivities.

Just so you know i cut and pasted this information because i was looking for a way to define my thought and they are better writers then me.

pick which ones you want from the list.

I believe in competing philosophies…….Statism vs Liberty. What often looks like a conspiracy is just the State doing what State does and that is encroach on our Liberty. For every bit of State expansion there is Liberty lost, but I don’t believe that if we just change to the “leaders” I want, would it change the situation. Look at the US Constitution.......we fought a war over the Despotic Kingdom in England for a Despotic Unitary State to be crafted here…..nice job folks….I choose not to delude myself with the fairytale bankers cabal is the root of all evil. Governments existed long before central banking. But that’s just reality.

It’s like the myth of Jesus and the “moneychangers”. First of all the moneychangers were not bankers……a current analogy would be currency traders. They ran a business of exchanging the moneys from near and far to the only money Herod would acceptfor taxes…. which was his local currency. Secondly Jesus not only threw out of the Temple the moneychangers….he threw out all the merchants from the Temple…...What he was pissed off about was the fact that the leader of the Temple was renting out space in the Temple period and taking a cut……The merchants were charging a premium which he thought to be usury. The temple was so sacred to him because it was his “Father” place. He didn’t go after the moneychangers in the streets……only in the Temple…….but in order to fit the agenda of the kooks the facts are ignored and twisted to blame the Hebrews as the evil bankers that want to control the world.

Is that enough reality for you right now…..because I have 30 years studying financial history and there is not a time that I don’t know about I will gladly research it for you? My research style is from an economic point of view…..with no agenda….other than reality.