Comment: Thanks for sharing.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: What is Law? (see in situ)

Cyril's picture

Thanks for sharing.

Thanks for sharing.

Well, I'm rather ignorant in the subtleties of the jargon around "law", there, but in all things human, I tend to try first the rule of thumb contained in the KISS principle... "Keep It Simple..."

So, I'm sure glad we can probably deal with the first 3 of your enumeration easily:

Divine Law - that would be for the religious/faithful (like me) or the contemplative or metaphysics amateur (I suppose atheists will want to skip this one with a shrug)

Natural Law - as I see it, that one will be of special interest as an object of study for the physicists, doctors of medicine, chemists, etc

Common Law - would that be what we often refer to as "common sense" and basic morality (right vs. wrong, non-aggression principle, theft is wrong, etc)?

I am more uneasy with the last three: could it be that malicious interpretations of any combination of these eventually brought us what Bastiat called "legal plunder" and that I tried to summarize?

Back to my point: if there is still room for improvement towards more simplicity and less incentives to pervert the law, I suspect it's among these last three that we ought to pay more attention to - or be wary of - what the legislators may be up to...

Just IMO/intuition.

Peace.

"Cyril" pronounced "see real". I code stuff.

http://Laissez-Faire.Me/Liberty

"To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous." -- Confucius