mischaracterized some of the content.
That being said, I still don't see any role in your plan for the Constitution. Without a relevant Constitution, I don't see much hope. And when anyone criticizes the idea of a Convention, the first question I want to see answered is, "what can we do to make the constitution the law of the land again?" Since you oppose a Convention but don't even address that question, I have to suppose you consider it as less relevant to our current predicament than i do.
But forgive me. I read your post, then skimmed half a dozen responses and some things got a bit jumbled.