Comment: Assumptions, yes, but ill-founded, no.

(See in situ)


Assumptions, yes, but ill-founded, no.

Why would me being skeptical of your story that I saw copied & pasted be ill-founded?
I'm not saying you didn't write it, but I can assume you did not write it just as much as I can assume you did.
I choose rather to be skeptical instead, because it is generally a wiser option than believing anything I read on the internet.
Whatever you actually witnessed, that's your deal, me believing what you write here doesn't change the fact that it happened or did not.

Like I said, your post still has the moral behind the story that I completely get. Never did I say anything bad about your story, just that I was confused why I was reading it a second time as though it were copied & pasted.

Good?