Comment: Actually, Paul is pragmatic in holding the Gvt. to it's story.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: yes, None of this conspiracy (see in situ)

Actually, Paul is pragmatic in holding the Gvt. to it's story.

The physical attack was orchestrated to be secondary to the psychological attack. The goal was cognitive dissonance and they have succeeded. It has been an extremely effective means of psychological manipulation and has caused for the American people to accept illogical power grabs resulting in assaults on our freedoms and prosperity.

There is no one explanation to the four attacks because various means and various redundancies and implausible coincidences were employed so as to make no one explanation plausible by itself. The end result is that no one theory can stand consistent with all of the known findings as one explanation ...

Paul is brilliant in forcing the government to stick to it's own story as a logical metric. The reason why this is brilliant is because the government's own story (for what it's worth)explains that the 9/11 attacks were promulgated extortion to cause the removal of US troops from protecting the Saudi monarchy from internal dissent which the US was doing in exchange for the ability to continue killing hundreds of thousand of innocent Iraqis from Saudi soil while also supporting Israel's slaughtering and displacement of innocent Palestinians(this according to Osama Bin Ladin, circa 1998).

Ergo, the one logical solution to everything else that is NOT understood would in fact be to NOT exacerbate the War on Terror, which itself of course has come at a cost of our freedoms and prosperity, but rather STOP PHUQING WITH PEOPLE WHO DON'T DESERVE TO BE PHUQUED WITH.

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. - Margaret Mead