Comment: Can someone please explain to

(See in situ)


Can someone please explain to

Can someone please explain to me (since everyone here seems to exactly what transpired), why the government used controlled demolition, rather than more crudely placed explosives that would have taken less time, resources, and made them less visible?

Why did they choose that building in particular?

Why were planes not enough, but an improperly collapsed building was too much?

Does anyone understand what it takes to prep a building for controlled demolition? How did they do it without anyone noticing? (please don't give me: they are the powerful government and can do anything argument)

How did they know that debris would fall from the twin towers and start a fire in 7 WTC so they could use that as a pretext for its collapse? Were they just going to claim it collapsed coincidentally?