Comment: I'm not quite following your reply

(See in situ)


I'm not quite following your reply

All I was saying is that Ron Paul has consistently said that 9/11 was the result of blowback. Just today he tweeted:

Here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQrwKr_b4Lg
he talks about "the reasons they attacked us" and it's clear who he thinks attacked us.
Here too, including the interview afterward, starting around 1:40:
http://www.ronpaul.com/2011-09-14/ron-paul-explains-reasons-...
Toward the end he talks about "the 19".

But then, and I think this is what you're getting at, there is a lot in the official reports that he does not endorse. I'm certainly not suggesting that just because he thinks this was a terrorist act that was an example of blowback that he is in any way endorsing any more of the official story than that.