It makes no such conclusion.
It investigated other options as well and found evidence that it could also refer to born abroad to a father that is a citizen.
It clearly mentions the Naturalization Act of 1790 and it uses it becuase the writers of the constitution also enacted this act.
Furthermore, you keep citing these Supreme Court Cases that have nothing to do with citizenship. Read the opinions.
You claim to be a Lawmanjed and I am going to assume that you are a police officer because you certainly are not an attorney.
My whole "original intent" of my first rebuttal to your OP was to insert a little uncertainty into the definition of Natural Born and it appear I have.
Now you are attempting to change the target.
Just admit that it is not as cut and dry as you originally thought.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: