Comment: I have actually

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: The buildings were worthless. (see in situ)

I have actually

explained that to him... he continues with the argument that the benefit (for the government to have been involved) doesn't justify the risk of demo-ing 3 buildings (loss of life, increasing the risk of people questioning what happened, etc). I think he feels like it would have been so stupid for them to have done that, that there's no way they (even if it was only a small group of them) did...

I honestly have no clue how to convince him that the NIST report is not accurate. Every (EVERY) time I show him anything I believe to be compelling evidence, he comes back with some link to an article "debunking" it by basically regurgitating the "official" story... and for him, that's as good as gold.

Ron Paul convert from the Heart of Dixie