Comment: Mainstream "Science" IS a religion...

(See in situ)


Mainstream "Science" IS a religion...

... based on dogmas. Anything that does not agree with their dogmas is heretical. A true scientist will create a procedure that gets a standard result within his limited understanding of the physical universe.

Climate science has not brought any results that can be talked about. Maybe some some that can't be: Why was the hurricane off New York on the 9/11 not reported on the weather channels? Why did it arrive shortly before the incident and leave shortly after? But that is an aside, although any informative answers form anywhere would be welcome. Judy Wood asked the question and was pariahed, but never answered. Its movement might be coincedence. But it's non-mention? And the two together?

The current dogmas have no clue about the origins of the matter they say cannot be created or destroyed but which somehow all existed in abundance at the moment of the big bang; and all psychic phenomena are the result of "delusion". Even those when children without access to current life info were correct about things buried in distant towns not previously visited in their current life.