Kerry: "I think they made a decision, based on the danger that it had of destroying other things, that they DID IT IN A CONTROLLED FASHION" (emphasis mine) "I think" are words that reflect ones individual knowledge or belief. He goes on to say that he will look into it, which supports the idea that he felt there might be something to actually look into.
I don't think the OP is claiming "hard evidence" as you go on to imply as one of the bases for your post. Then you go on to demean people who happen to believe other than you do using derogatory terms like "conspiracy under every rock". Next you bash the OP by stating outright falsehoods "there is a very large problem when we as liberty lovers accept soft evidence as hard evidence and this thread it the poster child of what I'm talking about." Please point out where the OP stated that this was Evidence of any sort. What I understand about the post is that Kerry made some very pointed statements about his understanding of BLDG 7 on 9/11, and the OP asked the DP what they think about it.
You further grasp at straws saying "NOTHING about knowing whether or not he has any knowledge of the events of Sept. 11 or that of building 7". Yet the fact is Bldg 7's destruction on 9/11 is the exact context of the conversation. The person asking the question was crystal clear about his statements, and Kerry was paying very close attention to his words. You are the one being deceptive by taking Kerry's words out of context.
Finally you do the exact same think that you accuse the OP of doing, which is speculate based on NO facts (at least the OP has a video to back up their point) with the following: "If anything Kerry was talking out of his ass, and he happened to use the word CONTROLLED..." (people can read the rest). You know this how?
I'm calling BS on your post because that is exactly what it is.
"Government is the entertainment division of the military-industrial complex". - Frank Zappa
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts a