Comment: Confessions of malinvestment?

(See in situ)

Confessions of malinvestment?

In that interview there is an obvious measure of misinformation concerning what will happen when the Federal Reserve/World Bank Fraud/Extortion Cabal goes out of business.

In order to point out that misinformation the idea here is to offer a counter investment strategy.

Scenario A:
Total, continued, reliance (investment), into a Legal Money Monopoly POWER, no matter how low in quality, and no matter how high in cost, that non-competitive supply of that ONE money is, in demonstrable fact.

Scenario B:
No more EXCLUSIVE investment in that SINGLE POWER, instead, there are emerging competitors offering higher quality and lower cost alternatives to the EXCLUSIVE MONOPOLY MONEY POWER.

In order for the reader to makes sense of this there is a connection that must be understood, a connection that cannot be ignored, or overlooked.

I can show you that connection by asking you, yes you, a question.

Answer the question.

What form of money is demanded as payment of DEBT by those liars who claim that you owe them DEBT?

Do you fail to understand even still?

Look here:

Look here:

Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.

Look here:

"But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.

"To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter."

The criminals claim that your earnings are theirs, then then spend your earnings in ways that destroy, consume, malinvest, your earnings, they even move your earnings to people who they inspire to be your enemies, and then they claim that you owe them, because they claim the the earnings they stole from you are loans that you borrowed from them.

As absurd as that may sound in my words, you can read the same thing reported to you by Alexander Hamilton, and you don't have to "believe" me, forget about me, listen to Hamilton, and know.

Now back to the two competitive scenarios (and I will add one):

Scenario A:
Total, continued, reliance (investment), into a Legal Money Monopoly POWER, no matter how low in quality, and no matter how high in cost, that non-competitive supply of that ONE money is, in demonstrable fact.

Scenario B:
No more EXCLUSIVE investment in that SINGLE POWER, instead, there are emerging competitors offering higher quality and lower cost alternatives to the EXCLUSIVE MONOPOLY MONEY POWER.

Scenario C:
The money stolen from you as Extortion Payments in Federal Reserve Notes that you had to ask for in exchange for your productive actions is used to finance all sides in the current World War and when your fellow Americans are consumed in that War, losing that war, the emerging POWER in Asia will then demand from you payments in the new World Reserve Currency as War reparations, or DEBT, whereby your supposed FEDERAL government enforces those payments as your earnings continue to flow from you to Asian "leadership", which is a trend that has been going on for decades if you cared enough to look.

So, of those possible Scenarios listed above please know that there are more than one person, more than one group, in more than one State, in this former Voluntary Union of Sovereign States (which is was under The Articles of Confederation), whereby competitive money supplies of high quality and low cost can be accepted by those who are in need of SOUND (ACCURATE and POWERFUL) MONEY.


Those who are the criminals (legal criminals) claim that there is only ONE MONEY.

Is that a valid claim?

How about this angle.

What is common among Central Bankers and War Profiteers?

Central Bankers extract POWER out of their victims, in the form of "profits," (increases in their bank accounts relative to everyone else's bank accounts, filling up with real assets) during Busts when the Central Bankers make the ONE money scarce (high interest rates, strict, and false, collateral requirements: you have to prove that you don't need the loan, or you won't get one), and the Central Bankers "profit" (make money make money, or "something for nothing") during the Boom part of their Business Cycle that they produce when they turn around and start flooding their EXCLUSIVE market with money by lowering interest rates and loaning money to people who prove to them that they cannot pay back the loan (liar loans) and the reason why Central Bankers make money (make money) the entire time their CYCLE is in operation is because they know when they are going to switch from BUST to BOOM, so they know when to sell when prices are highest, and they know when to buy when prices are lowest.

How does that relate to War Profiteers?

War Profiteers finance all sides in wars they create and they make "profits" of unimaginable proportions while they sell armaments to the victims they target as they scare the hell out of their victims while all sides are thereby threatening each other with pending doom, and so the defenders on all sides are willing to pay anything for the means (arms) with which to defend themselves, during the build up of war (boom). Then during the war all sides are even more desperate to pay any price in defense of their lives and as they are thereby inspired to seek revenge for the horror visited upon them by the opposing sides, all financed by the War Profiteers, during the war. Then as the war goes into the BUST phase, all sides are destroyed, and the War Profitteers are ready to supply reconstruction supplies and, again, inflated prices, because all sides are desperate, and willing to pay any price, to return to productive employment.

Now, if that does not make sense, and you understand The Business Cycle better, then please show me my error.

Note: Follow the ONE MONEY to the source of it, and you can find both Central Banker criminals and War Profiteers, or I am a monkey's uncle.

How about this angle:

If the only source of productive investment capacity (power) is ONE LEGAL on and off switch, then those having that EXCLUSIVE POWER can turn the switch OFF to those that that EXCLUSIVE POWER preferred to be OFF (POWERLESS) and that same EXCLUSIVE POWER can turn the switch ON to those that the EXCLUSIVE POWER preferred to be ON (POWERFUL) and with that in mind trace every unit of LEGAL PURCHASING POWER from the moment the EXCLUSIVE POWER created each unit of LEGAL PURCHASING POWER to the point at which a wheelbarrow full of units is needed to buy a loaf of bread.

Or, in other words: What is money laundering?

If 80% of each wheelbarrow full of units of LEGAL PURCHASING POWER originating for the same EXCLUSIVE source (The FED/World Bank/International Monetary FUND/Dollar Hegemony/Jesuit Vatican/New World Order), was initially issued to integral parts of the MONOPOLY so as to produce war materials and pay checks to all sides of the current World War, then how long does it take before each unit goes from the source of each unit to each wheelbarrow that later on uses those units to buy a loaf of bread?



As easy as 1,2,3: