Comment: A family is NOT a commune

(See in situ)


A family is NOT a commune

If it were, we wouldn't have the word 'family'. A family is NOT voluntary as it relies on blood ties. And it is not 'force' as it is natural - unless you want to consider the 'force of nature' as something centralized.
People have an idea of what a family is, albeit there are some who would like to change that though I personally do not endorse new concepts attached to traditional views. Sue me!
Merriam-Webster dictionary defines it as: a group of people who are related to one another. You may abandon your family or it may throw you out but you will always be John's daughter or Jane's son and that family link can never be broken. A libertarian may even rise from among a very staunch, progressive household and that libertarian will still belong to that family.
What you seem to be ignoring is that central or government force IS what shapes and defines communism and you can't separate the two.
And your quote from Acts, "sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men," is an example of charity and self-imposed austerity, not communism.
I think you should have thought this through a little more before blurting out your misquided conclusions. I knew two people who escaped from the USSR and knowing their stories I feel confident saying neither would agree with what you wrote.

If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
James Madison