Comment: Curious... What is it you disagree with that I said?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Conclusion (see in situ)

Curious... What is it you disagree with that I said?

Or what particularly 'happened' when I became too analytical?

Why is a lawyer not a good source? Someone with no knowledge of the constitution or the law, would be better? Maybe you are stereo-typing lawyers.

Just curious if you disagree with my conclusions and analysis, if so why?

Do you not agree with me on what constitutes a natural born citizen?

PEOPLE OPPOSING TYRANNY - Real Grass Roots!
Are you a POT or a PET - Person Embracing Tyranny?