Comment: No, THIS Amber Lyon:

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: You mean Amber Lyins' (see in situ)

No, THIS Amber Lyon:

Exclusive: CNN Exposed! Caught Producing "State Sponsored News" in Bahrain
Published on Sep 29, 2012

CNN Insider: CNN is A Hoax
Published on Oct 4, 2012

Joe Rogan Experience #273 - Amber Lyon
Published on Oct 5, 2012
Alt. YT URL:

Amber Lyon: MSM Covered Up State Sponsored Terrorism
Published on Oct 20, 2012

People do evolve, especially when they become the victims themselves; world's full of them, and their info, just gotta learn to discern the info, learn to read between the lines, omissions, facts, truths, and spins; I'm frankly so immune and beyond it all, it doesn't matter to me; I read over 20~50 news sources and blogs, daily, not all of them are Freedom movement material, but opposition research, and frankly idiot-statist Vigilance. I read to gauge a general zeitgeist of media direction, and HOW they report on certain events and geopolitical movements. But, especially: what they DON'T report on.

Somewhere between lies the truth.)

Plus, IF merely ignoring what those, whom, some us of disapprove their statist leanings of, were the litmus by which anyone should weigh what someone says, then 'we' should all wholly reject Glenn Greenwald and Scahill, as well. No?

Though, to be frank, with Scahill, there is 100% reason to be far more cautious; he's not as principled as people assume. Especially if you watched his recent promo-tours for his new book/film "Dirty Wars:" it lightly covers all the schit that most people interested in drone bombings and US foreign policy already know; just enough for a hipster attending his cocktail party to come off sounding/seeming/mimicking 'smart and informed,' nothing more, nothing less, IMHO: nothing hard hitting or hard-core about it, in context of other really label-fearless writers and journalists. I've long observed and thought this about Jeremy, before Corbett did this piece, recently:

Secrets of the Dirty Wars: What Jeremy Scahill Doesn't Tell You
Published on Jun 18, 2013


IMO, if Scahill were truly truly serious-serious, he'd be tackling more deeper into topics that those at cover during their lunch break. Plus, his Kryptonite: 9/11 Truth. The boy won't touch that schit with a million mile pole.

Scahill is what I call 'candy embeds.' They do just enough to seem rogue and palatable to anti-war leftists: if you compare him, to say Hastings, ask veterans they were embedded with; I've seen the type: I can almost guarantee that the vets that the likes of Scahill were embedded with will testify to a 'douchey' vibe, where as with Hastings, even as boyish as he may have seemed: you can tell, that's a 'man's man:' just ask Joe Biggs:

But beyond that: just because Lyon says she believes Hastings may have been murdered, does not negate the likelihood that he was; arguendo: just because Hitler liked ham-sandwiches and if you and I also like it, doesn't automatically mean you're a Nazi, nor negate the fact that ham-sandwiches are mouth-wateringly good and stomach fulfilling, no? Well... assuming you're an omnivore like me .D

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul