Many have been banned for far fewer transgressions than Granger has shown.
I think the immaturity stems from people giving her the "benefit of the doubt" when she has attacked so many recently. Especially when others (fishyculture) have NOT attacked others, and have been banned. I know that Michael is married, and likely does not have amorous intentions towards someone several decades his senior. I was pointing out the ridiculousness of this "love affair" with that quoted remark. Sorry if it offended your sensibilities so much you would call for my dismissal.
Now, Granger's account is reactivated within weeks, whereas fishyculture's account still remains in limbo. So something seems, fishy, to me.
Sure, bring my banning up for a vote; I'm very reluctant to post/comment here because of what happened back in April/May, so it wouldn't really affect my world much if you were successful.
I've appreciated your posts and comments since you came back.
Six months ago a truck smashed into me and cost me some brain cells; and added to my life, irritability, forgetfulness, and headaches. Perhaps I'm not nearly as compassionate as I used to be. Perhaps others might send some of that my way.
I think I've sworn only twice in my posting history. I do not believe that I have ever personally attacked anyone (their arguments, that's another story). So good luck with the banning, but hey, I bought fishyculture a camera when hers broke so I guess that makes me her associate and I should be banned too.
I love you. I'm sorry. Please forgive me. Thank you.
http://fija.org - Fully Informed Jury Association
http://jsjinc.net - Jin Shin Jyutsu (energy healing)
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Da