Comment: deacon, you read things in on both occasions

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: was I wrong? (see in situ)

Michael Nystrom's picture

deacon, you read things in on both occasions

I'm not your enemy either, and I'm sorry about the contempt. I'm an asshole.

But let me share with you a distinction that I learned about how we view the world. There is what happened, and there is the story we make up about what happened.

Think of them as two circles:

1) What Happened, and
2) The Story We Make Up About What Happened

- - - -

So - what happened?

I replied to your comment. I pointed out a fact (That I never mentioned the Granger in this thread). And I didn't respond to the other part because I didn't understand it.

But you made up a story about what happened, and it has some extra stuff in it.

Anyway, I hope that helps. I'm not attacking you. I'm just pointing out what people do. And I'm not singling out you. We all do it.

He's the man.