Comment: Caught Lying

(See in situ)


Caught Lying

Dean parrots the lie of hypocrisy which is essentially the opposite of the genuine concept of democracy.

"They [prejudice/collective punishment/blaming everyone in a group for the actions of individuals] HATE!"

The claim that "They HATE!" is made venomously, or with hatred, or malice aforethought aimed at a group, to punish the whole group, and the claimant exemplifies the HATE himself.

The reporter caught Dean on the lie, and then Dean showed his true colors defending the lie.

It is a craft. Deception in the form of blaming a THING for the actions of people, so as to divide and conquer.

Ventura is off too, but not on principle unless it can be confessed honestly that Ventura considers INVOLUNTARY "Taxation" as being morally, or even legally, just. If he does, he is either duped into that lie, or he is himself guilty of being in command of a criminal mind.

Beyond the very tangled web of deceit within the current false "shutdown" advertizement campaign there are principles at work that could be understood by more people, so as then to have more power commanded by those well informed people.

If the people (free, liberated, voluntary contributors to any government offer of any government service of any kind whatsoever, to be accepted, and paid for voluntarily, or to be rejected, and not paid for in any way), if the free people, if they, each, as individuals, decide not to pay another drop of sweat, blood, or tears, or red cent, or silver dime, or gold coin, or promise to pay according to a contractual obligation (that does not constitute slavery hidden behind false wording, or fine print) then less power, one individual person at a time, flows to the hired help, the servants, sitting, or lounging, or vacationing, on the government dole.

Talk about welfare?

In simple terms, very simple, very easy to understand, the people who actually empower government simply stop empowering government, and then government has no power.

Here are words of what was once the meaning of a Democrat:

http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm

"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer."

Before "Democrat" became a synonym for CRIMINAL (Involuntary Tax proponents, no matter what they say, are promoting the crime of robbery, and if what they say is understood by them to be false, then added to the crime of robbery is the crime of fraud), before Democrat became a synonym for CRIMINAL the term was a synonym for a person who is no longer enslaved by a Tyrannical Government, meaning that the person, the Democrat, no longer empowered a Tyrannical Government, which means that the individual, the free human being, decides to no longer pay for a Tyrannical Government.

Jesse Ventura is wrong when he says that George Washington and John Adams were not members of a Political Party. They were both Federalists.

People need to understand the principle differences, not the counterfeit versions of the differences, between one person and another person.

This is fundamental stuff, and a child can learn these principle differences.

The Federalists were planning and then producing Tyrannical Governments and they were individuals working cooperatively to reach that same goal.

If every one of the four people (Talking Heads) in the Video linked in this Topic all agree that "Taxes" (so called) must be paid, without question, because that is the way government must work, by necessity, then each one in that specific group is a member of the same group that plans for, and works for, the invention, and the production, and the maintenance of Tyrannical Governments.

That is only 4 people, all Talking Heads, merely spreading the lies that work to maintain Tyrannical Governments.

If you are also in that group, and you can either be honest with yourself, or you can fail to be honest with yourself, then you are a member of the same group. I call that group Legal Criminals.

Legal Criminals, if they admit it or not, to the themselves or anyone else, work for a flow of POWER flowing into a FUND that is enforced by falsehoods, threats of violence upon those who refuse to pay, and by violence upon those who refuse to pay, and the targets of those falsehoods, and the targets of those threats, and the targets of those acts of brutal violence are always the targets who just so happen to have the ability to produce something worth stealing.

If all 4 of those Talking Heads, including Jesse Ventura (Who I think will shake things up considerably this next Election Cycle or Psycho), if all 4 "believe" or "know" that "Taxes" must be paid, or else, without question, then each one is THE PROBLEM personified, each one supports, in that specific way, from that specific LIE, each one supports Tyrannical Governments or merely, honestly, and accurately, Crime being made Legal, Fraud being made Legal, Extortion being made Legal, on and on.

If anyone watching, commenting on, reading, acting, living, is also a member of that group, that Political Party, whereby the idea, the principle is to TAKE that which does not belong to you, then each one is a CRIMINAL in that specific, and accurate, measure.

The concept of democracy, where a person understands the concept, and becomes a so called Democrat, in history, is someone who regains control of their own POWER to either fund, or to not fund, a government.

Proof of this exists in written form, as I've already quoted from one of the PRINCIPLE publications that led to the next PRINCIPLE publication:

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transc...

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

HATE is a principle, and it belongs in the body of evil people who are criminals, and their mode of operation can be called Might makes RIGHT according to them, and their armies, so they say, with malice aforethought, you had better pay, because you will pay, one way or the other, and if you dare question the payments, you will pay that much more, so pay when you are told to pay, and don't question the payments.

There has always been a Political Party that has operated upon that principle of HATE.

There has always been opposition to that Political Party, the names change, because the HATERS steal the names of those who defend against the HATERS.

The classic example of stealing the names of the defenders occurred in the united states history.

Those Federalists, including George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and John Adams, were not driven by the principles of federalism, since federalism was opposite of what those people were working to invent, produce, and maintain.

Those false "Federalists" where working to invent, produce, and maintain a legal extortion racket which involved the enslavement of everyone by them.

They were not "Federalists" as proven by their actions, and as proven by their broken promises, and as proven by their secret words hidden from the victims.

George Washington almost lost the Revolutionary War.

Here is some evidence:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/1970/01/murray-n-rothbard/the-tro...

"His primary aim was to crush the individualistic and democratic spirit of the American forces. For one thing, the officers of the militia were elected by their own men, and the discipline of repeated elections kept the officers from forming an aristocratic ruling caste typical of European armies of the period. The officers often drew little more pay than their men, and there were no hierarchical distinctions of rank imposed between officers and men. As a consequence, officers could not enforce their wills coercively on the soldiery. This New England equality horrified Washington’s conservative and highly aristocratic soul."

After George Washington was made King of a Corporation known as The United States of America (no longer sovereign constitutionally limited states united into a voluntary union) he "conscripted" (enslaved by dictatorial order to obey without question) an army of invaders (for profit) to crush a money competitor in Pennsylvania.

Here:

http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/whiskey/...

"And whereas, it is in my judgment necessary under the circumstances of the case to take measures for calling forth the militia in order to suppress the combinations aforesaid, and to cause the laws to be duly executed; and I have accordingly determined so to do, feeling the deepest regret for the occasion, but withal the most solemn conviction that the essential interests of the Union demand it, that the very existence of government and the fundamental principles of social order are materially involved in the issue, and that the patriotism and firmness of all good citizens are seriously called upon, as occasions may require, to aid in the effectual suppression of so fatal a spirit;"

Alexander Hamilton, another so called Federalist, was the principle actor working to make a Kingdom out of a working union of constitutionally limited states.

Proof:

http://www.amazon.com/Reclaiming-American-Revolution-Kentuck...

"But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.
"To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter."

John Adams, another so called Federalist, was working as KING of the sat-elite corporation (a corporate entity controlled by the Bank of London), this United States of America corporation, not yet securing it's own Central Bank power, as "democratic" ("anti-federalist") forces (siding with France) began to resist oppression by speaking out, and by voicing warnings of the workings of the DESPOTS in POWER.

Proof:

http://www.ushistory.org/us/19e.asp

"The strong steps that Adams took in response to the French foreign threat also included severe repression of domestic protest. A series of laws known collectively as the Alien and Sedition Acts were passed by the Federalist Congress in 1798 and signed into law by President Adams. These laws included new powers to deport foreigners as well as making it harder for new immigrants to vote. Previously a new immigrant would have to reside in the United States for five years before becoming eligible to vote, but a new law raised this to 14 years."

The People (free people), not the Legal Persons (slaves or targets or those who produce anything worth stealing), resisted.

The people resisted.

The people who resisted spoke out, and what did the Tyrants in POWER as President of a Corporation (with an as yet not secure domestic sat-elite of the Central Banking fraud), what did the Tyrant John Adams, Federalist, himself, do?

The Tyrant made it a crime to speak the truth.

Did the free people obey without question?

What were the free people called?

What was the Political Party of the free people?

Democrats, Republicans, and Anti-Federalists, where some of the labels used to label the free people.

Democrats were demanding their rights to speak the truth.

Republicans were demanding a constitutionally limited state, or republic, that could join, and pay for, or not join (secede) and not pay for, a VOLUNTARY UNION of constitutionally limited REPUBLICS into a common law, common sense, mutually beneficial, defensive UNION of STATES.

United States are States United.

The United States of America is a corporation with a Central Bank Fraud used to cover up an Extortion Racket.

Proof:

http://www.ushistory.org/tour/first-bank.htm

"The war left us in debt. Some states were bankrupt. We needed one unified currency ... Hamilton suggested a central bank."

Hamilton may have said "we are broke," which is a familiar lie, because Hamilton, and all the other high paid liars, don't mean "we" as in "We The People" when Hamilton and the other high paid liars claim that "we" need a central bank.

Where do you think the COMMUNISTS like Marx, Engles, Stalin, George Bush, and Barry Soetoro got their ideas on how to perpetrate legalized fraud and extortion?

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

What do you call that, while some people call that legitimate, official, and legal?

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_amend...

"Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."

If you question that, according to some people, you are a criminal.

What do you call that?

Thought crime?

What is the penalty for thought crime?

You pay "Income Taxes" to a corporation that is only different from Wal-Mart in that their budget is less accurate and their employees wear different uniforms?

If anyone uses, right now, a fraudulent World Reserve Currency Note, such as a so called Federal Reserve Note, then that "person" is an employee of that corporation in some way, by some measure, even if the only measure is the amount of POWER the note had when the person received the note (it is worth this much now) and when the note is used to buy something the note is worth more, or the note is worth less, and therefore the EMPLOYMENT is either a gain or loss by the EMPLOYEE or the EMPLOYER.

If the criminals running the World Reserve Currency Fraud "double the money supply" then they win, because they get to buy things with that money they create (out of paper and ink, or out of digits in a computer terminal), and it may be a good idea, for the EMPLOYEES to know how much "double the money supply" really is, as it is, in fact, as much money as everyone else combined.

Like this:

2008 is a year that The Federal Reserve suddenly doubled the money supply, as one example of what is being done.

So 2007 there is X number of Legal Federal Reserve Notes owned, or used, by all the EMPLOYEES, you, me, anyone with Federal Reserve Notes. So add up all those Federal Reserve Notes that exist, everywhere, anywhere, all of those units, every one, not including the Counterfeit ones, all the REAL LEGAL ones, every one, add up every bank account, every retirement account, every dollar, everywhere, add it all up in 2007.

Then you have a number of Legal Money Units and just for laughs that TOTAL number of Legal Money Units in 2009 can be found in the actual Federal Reserve Account or FUND.

http://www.garynorth.com/public/department29.cfm

Rather than hunting down the official number, I use the number X.

X is the number and it can be 684,641,684,646,465,416.00, rounded off to the dollar, not counting accurately to the penny.

Who knows?

How much is the so called National Debt, a guess as to the current total number of dollars?

They know, that is the point, they know how much Money they Made, they must know, it is their account, you know how much is in your account, they know how much you owe them, they know, they know because the Make twice as much money suddenly, not knowing how much they already made and then suddenly reporting that now there is twice as much, proves that they knew how much they already made (and spent) and how much they have now (and are going to spend).

What do they buy? They buy wars.

The find out how much money everyone else already uses, and they, at that Political Party, those Federal Reservists, they write themselves a check, and they write the check on the "Tax Payers" ability to repay, without question, that DEBT.

Simple?

They, not ambiguously "they," not a group of ghosts, but a list of people in a Political Party, who are "they" and they create as much money as everyone else combined and they they spend that much money, and when they do so they effectively steal the POWER to PURCHASE that was once commanded by everyone else, because the addition of the sudden increase in "NEW" money, which is being spent by them, those people in that ONE POLITICAL PARTY, they, those people, get to spend that "NEW" money, and you don't, so the effect is that YOUR money, while it is YOURS, is "depreciated," as YOUR money POWER is cut in half, because THEY double the money supply.

So you work for the BANK and the CENTRAL BANK POLITICAL PARTY demands that you pay them for the privilege you get for working for them.

You give them the POWER to make you pay them for their generous gift that they give you in exchange for you giving them POWER, they offer back to you a generous gift from them, to allow you to pay them even more.

You pay them so as to then give them the power to employ you at a Job that they "subsidize," such as Wal-Mart, so Wal-Mart is just another sat-elite of the Central Bank EMPLOYERS (Political Party) and since you are GIVEN that opportunity to work, you are GIVEN the opportunity to pay even more to those people, at that POLITICAL PARTY, THE CENTRAL BANK PARTY, you get to pay them more, even while you sleep.

So, if you have read this far, and you look over at the latest picture of the latest President of the Corporation, you can laugh at the jokes, ha, ha, ha, I have two words for you, PREDATOR DRONE, ha, ha, ha, so funny, ha, ha, ha, children being shredded and burned alive, ha, ha, ha, so funny, and look at the sad face?

What, the EMPLOYEES are not paying?

PREDATOR DRONE

Ha, ha, what a laugh.

Joe