Comment: if the eyewitness' assertions are true,

(See in situ)

if the eyewitness' assertions are true,

then that means the armed state thugs clearly used her for live organism target practice.

If they had the time and the opportunity to remove the child, from an unarmed woman, that means with all the tools and oppressive tools available to them, from Taser, pepper-spray, 'less than lethal' 12ga loads, baton, to their lowest-common-denominator-compliance/choke-hold/faux-JiuJitsu joint-lock techniques, with that many LE vs. a single woman, they could've easily overpowered her.

But obviously, instead, they simply chose to shoot her dead: they murdered her.

As their saying goes: "Dead witnesses tell no tales."

PS. Worse: assuming the child was locked in the rear baby safety-seat, which still takes a bit of time to unlock, that means they had even more ample time to subdue Miriam, without resorting to murdering her!

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul