Comment: I understand. In traditional

(See in situ)


I understand. In traditional

I understand.

In traditional communities, even back in India, consanguineous marriage (couple who have common grand-parent(s)) has caused so much birth-defects in babies. While I appreciated the close-to-earth living style of the Amish, I am in no way appreciating or evaluating their intra-marriage style.

Life-style/stress diseases such as diabetes, heart-disease, cancer etc.. should be historically low in such communities. But genetic defects might be high.

One interesting point to ponder is, Whether consanguinity was/is always part of Traditional societies? And if so, are traditional societies completely wrong and un-natural since consanguinity actually doesn't make any evolutionary sense.