the New York Times is referring to in this statement...
"distancing himself from some inflammatory views held by his father".
Inflammatory? Ron Paul? What are they talking about? Is it now inflammatory to suggest that the country should stop adding to it's debt? Stop killing women and children overseas with drone strikes? That the Federal Government's power is constrained by the Constitution? That the law should pertain to individuals and not to groups? Does the author really believe his statement, or is this yet another example of how the MSM are telling people what to believe rather than telling people how to think for themselves.
"The dearest ambition of a slave is not liberty, but to have a slave of his own."
Sir Richard Burton
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: