Comment: Are you claiming

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: you sir are an idiot (see in situ)

Are you claiming

authority exists and it is possessed by a government?

Looks like the burden of proof is on you idiot.

I am not the one asserting authority. Furthermore it is impossible to prove a negative such as no authority. What could possibly constitute proof of the absence of authority idiot? If a glass is empty at a precise point in time at a given place does an absence of water in the glass evidence water does not exist? Get out of here with your burden of proof shifting delusions.

Entity A: Authority exists.

Entity B: I don't believe it does.

Entity A: The burden of proof is on you to prove it doesn't.

Superchicken idiot logic right there. Don't worry I am still having a nice time and have no difficulty stating something that makes logical sense.