The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: So you say, but it was lost in rhetoric

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: I supplied the purpose - (see in situ)

So you say, but it was lost in rhetoric

I know I've asked you maybe 5 times if you think Americans should be able to share information vital to survival and if doing so demonstrates constitutional intent.

This is basic biological, phylogenetic DNA of social interaction-the purpose free speech needs to serve in a human community. You do not need rocket science for this. IN FACT, bringing it in is unconstitutional because it is counterproductive towards using information that the masses can use.

Accountability means a clear answer.

Can we stop doing all the things we are doing that we do not want to do while still doing what we need to do?