Comment: Why not look at home instead?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: seems like a stretch. I was (see in situ)

Why not look at home instead?

The legal precedent occurring between 1776 and 1788 when these united states (states united voluntarily) worked as a Free Market Government Design, there was a lack of consent in Massachusetts that became known as Shays's Rebellion.

What happened in that case?

If you care to know, I can offer my end in a discussion, and a few sources of information.

When the criminals take over the government, and therefore consent is no longer working, the victims of the criminal government become slaves to those criminals who took over that government. What do the slaves do when they do not consent to being slaves?