That I never said he was advocating preemptive war. That's your presumption, which is wrong. I said he was advocating MILITARISM, which he is. He is also advocating foreign occupation and gleefully points out that OUR troops in S. Korea are the reason that N. Korea won't attack. Thus MILITARISM. Policing the world. How does that fall in line with ANY libertarian thinking? I took a nice hike and came back with a far better understanding than you apparently. You should try it.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner,