Comment: The rest of the article below.

(See in situ)


The rest of the article below.

While Kahan cautioned against thinking the results can be used to explain deep ideological fights over climate change and other politically relevant science, and he said the results wouldn’t change his negative views of the tea party, he did say he will no longer make assumptions about the level of knowledge on his opponents’ side.

His negative view was based on a false assumption but he still won't change his opinion?