Comment: More bad reasoning

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Strict Liability "crimes" (see in situ)

More bad reasoning

So I post something critical of strict liability crimes.

You then respond with a long rambling post which claims I support strict liability crimes. Again, you demonstrate very clearly that your thought processes are a little off.

And also, such things are rather recent inventions, tracing their roots more to 1980s "get tough on crime" political ad campaigns. The common laws relating to crimes all required both a mens rea and actus reus. Look it up in your Blacks.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."-- Albert Einstein