Comment: But here's what I don't understand

(See in situ)

But here's what I don't understand

If free staters are taking over the government to create a free state, then where are they represented in government? Why doesn't the free stater police chief send them home? What about the city council? School board? etc. etc.

If there's not a critical mass of free staters enough to take over, then what's the problem? Either you get them and take over, or the free stater movement is irrelevant.

I'm not being critical. Please educate me. Please explain it if and why what I said above is not correct.

Thank you. Please don't down vote without an explanation. In sincerity, what's the point of free stater-ism if there is not a free state?