Comment: Who is diverting attention?

(See in situ)

Who is diverting attention?

There is, in fact, a World Reserve Currency Power.

Who is confused about it, name someone, and then name someone else who is, actually, as a matter of fact, confused about it, name anyone who can claim that "it" is somehow a "religious" struggle.

I don't.

Religion is, if it is anything, a method of avoiding conflict among human beings.

So who spreads falsehoods concerning any false fronts placed in front of the actual criminals who actually have the POWER to write themselves a check for as much money as everyone else combined, and get away with it for centuries?

The central banking crime of extortion and fraud world wide is not tough to figure out, and not at all difficult to find the culprits.

Follow the legal fraud money, such as the Current World Reserve Currency known as Federal Reserve Notes, back to the source of it, and there, like following the rainbow to find the pot of gold, will be those few who use the money they steal to buy the wars they need to keep their POWER over their victims.

So who is confused about it?

Name one person.

If you are naming Sutton as the one person who is confused about it, then my guess is that you are the one confused, since each LABEL used by the criminals are merely LABELS, nothing more, as a means of covering up the facts, so it is not a confusion to use their current LABEL when the criminals are currently using the current LABEL that LABELS the criminals.

Sutton was very meticulous in his work, so it is very likely that the changing of the LABELS from Jewish Conspiracy to Jesuit Conspiracy, or to NeoCon Conspiracy, would be as obvious to Sutton as it would be to the actual criminals who work to manufacture new LABELS for the same old reason: to mask the actual criminals perpetrating the actual crimes of WAR FOR EXCLUSIVE PROFIT.

Once the crime is known for what it is, the labels serve as inculpatory evidence, no longer serving the purpose of deception.

That is proven to be factual when any one of you, any one reading this, finally realizes the nature of the crime, and you see, for a fact, that Federal Reserve Notes PROVE that a crime is NOW in progress, and each manufactured unit of FRAUD money exists as PROOF that the criminals are still getting away with the CRIMES they perpetrate.

National Debt is merely extortion covered up by fraud made legal by criminals UPON the whole country.

Internal Revenue "Service", or extortion made legal, is the violence arm of the National Debt Crime.

The "Federal" Reserve, or Monopoly Central Banking, is merely fraud made legal to cover up the violence made legal by the same criminals UPON the same country.

Fraud merely covers up the naked violence of extortion.

Those doing the extorting can claim that they were just following orders, without question.

3 SOURCES follow:


"But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program.

"To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In Federalist N. 12, Hamilton noted that because "[t]he genius of the people will ill brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise law," such taxes would be little used by the national government. In power, the Secretary of the Treasury soon changed his mind and the tax on the production of whiskey rankled Americans living on the frontier. Cash was scarce in the West and the Frontiersmen used whiskey as an item of barter."

The Central Bankers MUST crush all legal money competitors in ORDER to get a working Monopoly (whereby there is no force of competition forcing money quality up, and money cost down TO THE CONSUMER).

When the First Bank of the United States was competitively thrown out, the criminals tried for The Second Bank of the United States, it was also thrown out, and then there was an time called Wildcat Banking, just before the so called Civil War.

Back to the first source:


"Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right.

"Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government,the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely."

Federalism was working during the time between 1776 and 1788, but that competitive government or Free Market government design was removed with the first Con Con in 1787.

When the final nail goes into the coffin of Liberty each one of us will be at each other's throat.

Each nail is ours to remove, or ignore.


Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.


"Mr. Chairman—Whether the Constitution be good or bad, the present clause clearly discovers, that it is a National Government, and no longer a confederation. I mean that clause which gives the first hint of the General Government laying direct taxes. The assumption of this power of laying direct taxes, does of itself, entirely change the confederation of the States into one consolidated Government. This power being at discretion, unconfined, and without any kind of controul, must carry every thing before it. The very idea of converting what was formerly confederation, to a consolidated Government, is totally subversive of every principle which has hitherto governed us. This power is calculated to annihilate totally the State Governments. Will the people of this great community submit to be individually taxed by two different and distinct powers? Will they suffer themselves to be doubly harrassed? These two concurrent powers cannot exist long together; the one will destroy the other: The General Government being paramount to, and in every respect more powerful than, the State governments, the latter must give way to the former."

Bonus link 4:

"There can be no doubt we are in the middle of the greatest power struggle since World War II. It is uncertain whether the Jesuits will prevail and the system restored to order, or whether the Vatican and Illuminati will succeed in breaking the shackles of forced subservience after 200 years."

Either the information is useful or not, and if the idea is to use the information available to gain at someone's expense, then that is just another person joining in on the crime made legal, if on the other hand the information available is useful in defense against being used by criminals, then that is what happens in time and place for that individual, or for that group.