Comment: What evidence do you have

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Well the drinking thing was a (see in situ)

What evidence do you have

For any of those claims?
He's a student of the enlightenment, of revolution and of mental emancipation. His trotskyite and marxist education was all but faded by the time he was a public figure. What personal behavior are you talking about? What confused faith? You sound like a scorned religious person, the very kind who go on and on about a person and never about what they said. He was right about religion, he was right about the sexes, he was right about henry kissinger, he was right about the clintons, he was right about the political class. Give me one example of him not "hanging" with strict logic, show me the debate. I guarantee you he won it by a landslide and the only ones attacking him instead of his argument thought any different.

No train to Stockholm.